When applying coating materials to complex industrial structures, there are several factors that should be considered, including the selection of a spray application method and proper spray technique that will help achieve continuous coverage at the correct thickness. This article describes several techniques that can be used to optimize film build when applying coating materials by spray to industrial structures in the shop or field.
Distance: The distance that the spray gun is held from the surface can impact film build, continuity, and the overall appearance of the finish. The proper distance is based on the type of equipment, the coating material spray characteristics as well as the prevailing environmental conditions.
The two most common methods of spray application for industrial coatings include conventional (air) spray and airless spray. Conventional spray is generally selected when the applicator desires greater control over the amount of paint exiting the spray gun as well as the fan width. The use of conventional spray is desirable for coating of complex configurations. The recommended distance (spray gun tip-to-workpiece) is 6 to 8 inches. Conventional spray uses atomization air (typically 50-75 psi) to break-up or “atomize” the stream of paint as it exits the spray gun. This is accomplished through an air cap. If the gun is held too far from the surface, the atomization air will drive off the solvents as the particles traverse through the air, inhibiting their ability to knit and flow the coating once the paint particles reach the surface resulting in dry spray. Obviously, the type of coating and prevailing environmental conditions (e.g., air temperature, wind, etc.) as well as the temperature of the surface influence atomization and flow-out. Conversely if the gun is positioned too close to the surface, the atomization air will blow into the wet coating causing an orange peel appearance. Due to the number of factors that impact spray gun distance it is recommended to adjust the pot and atomization pressures and optimize the distance prior to large scale application of the coating.
For airless spray, the operator has much less control, and the coating is atomized differently. In this case, the paint is forced through a small orifice in the spray tip (e.g., 0.023”) under high pressure (e.g., 2400 psi), which is then reduced back to atmospheric pressure as the paint exits the spray tip. This pressure differential (high-to-low) causes the coating to atomize. Since there is no atomization air to “dry” the paint particles as they leave the spray tip, and the pressures are significantly higher, the spray distance is also greater. For airless spray the recommended spray distance is 12-18”. If the gun is held too close, excessive film build is likely to occur, resulting in runs and sags. Like conventional spray, the type of coating, prevailing conditions and other factors will influence spray distance. Therefore, it is recommended to optimize the pump pressure, tip size and spray distance prior to large scale application of the coating.


Triggering: Another technique that can help generate a consistent film build is triggering of the spray gun at the beginning and end of each spray pass. The operator should pull the trigger of the gun outside of the area being coated, traverse across the surface (not to exceed approximately 3-feet), and then release the trigger. The process is repeated as spray passes are applied. This process helps ensure a more consistent film build, preventing heavy areas at the beginning of the pass and light areas at the end of the spray pass. The engaging and disengaging of the trigger also keeps the fluid tip clear.

In summary, there are several techniques that can be employed to help ensure a quality application, including spray gun distance, gun positioning, overlapping of spray passes, triggering and proper application of the coating to edges/corners.

For more information contact Carly McGee: cmcgee@kta.com


Very well spoken/written article. Good, clear and accurate information.
Especially adding the greatest most prevalent factor. That being real, on the job practice.
I did not catch, or you may have omitted using a real wet mil gauge while painting/spraying at multiple locations to check for oneself how they are in staying consistent with the thickness at different or multiple areas being coated. As this was how I was taught, only thing was they had assumed I knew how to use a wet mil gauge. I did not. So, somewhere in Ontario, Canada, there is a bridge with a LOT of sags due to an abundance of paint being applied exceeding any normal thickness. Truthfully, that bridge has probably been repainted a couple times since the late eighties.
FYI to all you Journeymen and teachers, it is better to explain in detail all that is involved with any application than to assume anyone knows or understands all things, sometimes we are too shy, or too proud to ask questions.